Tokenomics Audit Desk

Tokenomics Audit — Jito (JTO)

Tokenomics Desk · 2026-10-24T22:13:34.866Z · Chain: solana · Contract: jtojtomepa8beP8AuQc6eXt5FriJwfFMwQx2v2f9mCL

Verdict: Needs work

Red-flag score: 31/100 — Guarded

Disclaimer (short form). Economic triage based on public on-chain and aggregator data. Not a smart-contract security audit. Not financial advice. No price predictions. See the closing section for full disclaimers.

1. Executive summary

Verdict: Needs work. The three findings that matter most:

2. Token snapshot

Total supply (global)1,000,000,000
Supply on solana (on-chain)986,522,404
Circulating supply535,820,549
Max supplyUNKNOWN
Circulating ratio53.6%
Price$0
Market cap$231,821,114
FDV$432,646,928
Holder count (this chain)UNKNOWN
Top 1 holder shareUNKNOWN
Top 10 holder shareUNKNOWN
DEX liquidity (all pairs)$1,675,045
DEX volume 24h$195,033
DEX pairs30
Mint authorityNONE (revoked)
Freeze authorityNONE (revoked)

Sources: CoinGecko (market/supply), chain RPC (on-chain reads), Blockscout (holders, EVM), DEXScreener (liquidity/volume), DefiLlama (fees; emissions when tracked). Accessed 2026-10-24T22:13:34.866Z.

3. Findings — ranked by severity

1. HIGH Supply schedule & issuance

Supply is uncapped in aggregator data — no maximum supply is published, so dilution depends on issuer discretion.

Evidence: total_supply=986,522,404, max_supply=None (CoinGecko)

2. INFO Supply schedule & issuance

Mint authority is revoked — supply cannot be inflated by the issuer.

Evidence: SPL mint account: mint_authority option = 0

3. LOW Vesting & unlock calendar

Unlock schedule is UNKNOWN — the protocol is not tracked by DefiLlama emissions and no schedule was machine-readable. Missing evidence: a published unlock/vesting schedule from the project's docs.

Evidence: DefiLlama emissions endpoint unavailable (paywalled) or protocol untracked — unlock schedule UNKNOWN.

4. LOW Concentration & governance risk

Holder distribution is UNKNOWN — the holder source returned no data for this token. Missing evidence: explorer holder list.

Evidence: holders source empty

4. Analysis

Holder concentration — UNKNOWN

Holder distribution not measurable from public sources this run.

Insider concentration

UNKNOWN — insider allocation % requires the project's published allocation docs (manual checkpoint).

Unlock risk

54% of supply circulates; 46% is locked or unissued — future unlock pressure exists even where the calendar is unpublished.

Value accrual

The protocol charges real fees (DefiLlama). Whether any of that value reaches token holders — buyback, burn, revenue share — is UNKNOWN without the project's docs (manual checkpoint).

Annualized protocol fees (24h × 365): $108,245,130 · fees/FDV = 25.02%

Peer comparison

UNKNOWN — no curated peer set for this token yet.

5. Methodology, limitations & disclaimers

Public sources only: the aggregators and chain data named above, accessed on the date shown. No internal cap tables, no private agreements, no team-wallet labels beyond what sources publish. Checkpoints requiring project documentation (initial allocation, holder capture of fees, demand drivers) are graded in the manual review layer; the engine grades only what it measured and marks the rest UNKNOWN rather than guessing. Figures are a snapshot; tokenomics change — re-check before acting.

1) Not a security audit — no contract code, custody, or operational security was reviewed. 2) Not financial advice — no recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any token. 3) No price predictions — supply mechanics only; valuation figures are arithmetic, not forecasts. 4) Public sources — errors in source material propagate; verify independently. 5) No outcome guarantees — a Sound grade does not imply performance; a Fragile grade does not imply failure. 6) Independence — prepared without engagement from the project team beyond the review fee, which does not influence grades.

Tokenomics Desk — audit portfolio · GitHub · contact: btupm4@aimailbox.dev