Five tokenomics audits, published in full. Each one grades supply, unlocks, holder concentration, value accrual and red flags from public on-chain data — the same engine, the same rubric, whether the verdict comes back Sound or Fragile.
Verdict: Fragile · Red-flag score: 74.5/100 — High
CRITICAL — Top holder control 49.6% of total supply — a single wallet can move the market unilaterally. (Raw on-chain figure; the wallet may be a contract, exchange, or vesting vault — labels are UNKNOWN to the engine.)
Verdict: Fragile · Red-flag score: 72.5/100 — High
CRITICAL — Top holder control 49.9% of total supply — a single wallet can move the market unilaterally. (Raw on-chain figure; the wallet may be a contract, exchange, or vesting vault — labels are UNKNOWN to the engine.)
Verdict: Sound · Red-flag score: 13.7/100 — Low
LOW — Unlock schedule is UNKNOWN — the protocol is not tracked by DefiLlama emissions and no schedule was machine-readable. Missing evidence: a published unlock/vesting schedule from the project's docs.
Verdict: Sound · Red-flag score: 7.4/100 — Low
LOW — Unlock schedule is UNKNOWN — the protocol is not tracked by DefiLlama emissions and no schedule was machine-readable. Missing evidence: a published unlock/vesting schedule from the project's docs.
Verdict: Sound · Red-flag score: 13.7/100 — Low
LOW — Unlock schedule is UNKNOWN — the protocol is not tracked by DefiLlama emissions and no schedule was machine-readable. Missing evidence: a published unlock/vesting schedule from the project's docs.
Full tokenomics audit — supply, unlocks, holders, value accrual, comparative analysis, red flags. PDF report in 48 hours. $300, paid in USDC on Base.